The basic mechanism
The dual structure of corporate tax and personal tax, and how to think about setting compensation.
BasicsComparing tax rates
The corporate effective tax rate vs. the personal marginal tax rate (income tax + residence tax + social insurance).
ComparisonSimulation by compensation amount
A side-by-side comparison of the optimal compensation for pre-compensation profits of ¥10M and ¥20M.
SimulationThe impact and ceilings of social insurance premiums
The ceilings for employees' pension and health insurance, and their impact on compensation design.
Social insuranceThe rules for fixed regular salary
The requirements for deductibility and the timing at which you can change it.
PracticePoints to note
The risk of excessive director compensation being disallowed, spreading compensation to family, and more.
CautionThe basic way to think about setting director compensation
Compensation received by a director of a small or mid-sized company (such as a representative director) can be included in the corporation's deductible expenses. This reduces the corporation's taxable income and lowers its corporate tax. However, the compensation the individual receives is subject to income tax, residence tax, and social insurance premiums.
In other words, director compensation is an "adjustment valve" for allocating money between the corporation and the individual. The following two forces pull against each other.
- The corporation's taxable income decreases
- Corporate tax decreases (up to 34% in tax savings)
- The cash remaining in the corporation decreases
- The individual's employment income increases
- Income tax and residence tax increase
- Social insurance premiums (health + pension) increase
→ Raising director compensation is advantageous (corporate tax savings > increased personal tax)
→ Raising director compensation is disadvantageous (increased personal tax > corporate tax savings)
If you later take out funds left in the corporation as dividends, dividend income tax (about 20%) applies separately. Over the long run, taking money out "as director compensation" is often more advantageous than "retaining it in the corporation → paying dividends," so it is important to design your plan with the exit strategy included.
Comparing the corporate tax rate vs. the personal effective tax rate
The starting point for optimizing director compensation is to contrast "the tax rate on the corporate side" with "the effective tax rate on the personal side."
The corporate effective tax rate (small/mid-sized companies with capital of ¥100 million or less)
| The corporation's taxable income | Corporate tax rate (national tax) | Effective tax rate (rough estimate including local taxes) |
|---|---|---|
| ¥8 million a year or less[NTA No.5759 (in Japanese)] | 15% (reduced rate) | about 21% |
| Over ¥8 million a year | 23.2% | about 34% |
* The effective tax rate is a rough estimate including corporate residence tax and corporate enterprise tax. It differs for corporations with capital over ¥100 million and for group-aggregation corporations.
The individual's marginal effective tax rate (income tax + residence tax + social insurance premiums)
| Director compensation (annual) guide | Marginal income tax rate | Residence tax | Social insurance premiums (individual's share) | Total effective tax rate (rough estimate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up to ¥2 million | 5% | 10% | about 14% | about 20–24% |
| ¥2 million – ¥4 million | 5–10% | 10% | about 14% | about 25–32% |
| ¥4 million – ¥6 million | 10–20% | 10% | about 14% | about 32–39% |
| ¥6 million – ¥8 million | 20% | 10% | about 14% | about 39–44% |
| ¥8 million – ¥10 million | 20–23% | 10% | about 10–14% (approaching the pension ceiling) | about 40–44% |
| ¥10 million – ¥18 million | 33% | 10% | about 7–10% (over the pension ceiling) | about 45–50% |
* Rough estimates after the FY2025 (Reiwa 7) revision (basic deduction ¥580,000). Social insurance premiums are the director's own share under the Japan Health Insurance Association (Tokyo).
It pays first to shift into director compensation the portion of the corporation's taxable income that exceeds ¥8 million (corporate tax rate about 34%). Since the individual's effective tax rate starts to exceed 34% at around ¥6 million of annual income (including social insurance), an annual income of around ¥5–6 million is a guide for many small and mid-sized business owners.
Simulation by director compensation amount
In two patterns with different "corporate profit before paying director compensation (pre-compensation profit)," we compare the total of the individual's take-home pay plus the corporation's remaining cash as the amount of director compensation changes.
Pattern A: pre-compensation profit of ¥10 million
| Director compensation (annual) | Individual take-home (rough estimate) | Corporation's remaining cash (rough estimate) | Total (rough estimate) | Total tax burden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ¥0 (all retained in the corporation) | ¥0 | ¥7.64M | ¥7.64M | ¥2.36M |
| ¥2 million | ¥1.61M | ¥6.32M | ¥7.93M ◀ Maximum | ¥2.07M |
| ¥3 million | ¥2.36M | ¥5.53M | ¥7.89M | ¥2.11M |
| ¥4 million | ¥3.09M | ¥4.74M | ¥7.83M | ¥2.17M |
| ¥6 million | ¥4.44M | ¥3.16M | ¥7.60M | ¥2.40M |
| ¥10 million | ¥6.96M | ¥0 | ¥6.96M | ¥3.04M |
* With a profit of ¥10 million, the portion over ¥8 million is only ¥2 million (the high 34% rate). Since ¥2 million of director compensation brings the corporate income down to exactly ¥8 million, that is the optimal point.
Pattern B: pre-compensation profit of ¥20 million
| Director compensation (annual) | Individual take-home (rough estimate) | Corporation's remaining cash (rough estimate) | Total (rough estimate) | Total tax burden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ¥0 (all retained in the corporation) | ¥0 | ¥14.24M | ¥14.24M | ¥5.76M |
| ¥4 million | ¥3.09M | ¥11.60M | ¥14.69M | ¥5.31M |
| ¥6 million | ¥4.44M | ¥10.28M | ¥14.72M ◀ Maximum | ¥5.28M |
| ¥8 million | ¥5.64M | ¥8.96M | ¥14.60M | ¥5.40M |
| ¥10 million | ¥6.96M | ¥7.64M | ¥14.60M | ¥5.40M |
| ¥15 million | ¥9.71M | ¥3.95M | ¥13.66M | ¥6.34M |
| ¥20 million (all as compensation) | ¥12.51M | ¥0 | ¥12.51M | ¥7.49M |
* Calculation conditions: one director, single, Japan Health Insurance Association Tokyo, FY2025 (Reiwa 7) tax system (basic deduction ¥580,000). Rough estimates accounting for the employment income deduction, income tax, residence tax, and social insurance (the individual's share). Please confirm with your tax accountant using your actual figures.
Because the corporate tax saved (¥6M×34% = ¥2.04M) > the individual's net tax increase (¥1.56M), setting director compensation is advantageous.
A basic starting point is to set compensation so that the corporation's taxable income (after director compensation) fits within ¥8 million or less. Shifting the portion over ¥8 million (rate 34%) to the individual is advantageous, but a realistic point to pause is around ¥6 million of annual income, where the individual's effective tax rate starts to exceed 34%.
The impact and ceilings of social insurance premiums
Directors are also compulsorily enrolled in social insurance (health insurance + employees' pension). Social insurance premiums are calculated based on the monthly compensation amount, and the company (corporation) and the director split them equally. The higher the compensation, the higher the premiums; but because there are ceilings, the impact eases once you exceed a certain level.
The ceiling for employees' pension is ¥650,000/month (¥7.8 million a year). Above this, there is no additional employees' pension burden, and the individual's effective tax rate falls. If you want to maximize your future pension benefits while saving on tax, there is room to consider a first-stage optimization at around ¥7.8 million of annual income. Also, since the corporation's social insurance share (its half) is fully deductible, you could say that the corporation absorbs part of the individual's social insurance cost.
The fixed regular salary rule and the timing at which you can change it
To include director compensation in the corporation's deductible expenses, you must meet the requirements for "fixed regular salary." Compensation that falls outside the requirements becomes non-deductible and may increase corporate tax[NTA No.5200 (in Japanese)].
② Revision due to worsening performance: where a marked deterioration in business results or financial condition is recognized
③ Extraordinary revision: where a director's position or scope of duties "changes markedly"
Points to note and common pitfalls
The optimal amount changes with business results, family composition, the annual revision of social insurance (every April), and tax reforms. We recommend running estimates with your tax accountant at least at the start of each period and setting a compensation amount that matches your target profit for that year.
FAQ
By when should I decide director compensation?
To make it deductible, the rule is in principle "fixed regular salary": decide the amount within 3 months from the start of the fiscal year, and pay the same amount every month. If you increase or decrease it during the year without reason, that changed portion cannot be included in deductible expenses.
Is it always better to make director compensation higher?
No. Raising compensation reduces corporate tax, but the individual's income tax, residence tax, and social insurance premiums (the employer and employee shares combined) increase. The optimal level is where the decrease in corporate tax and the increase on the personal side balance out, and generally an annual income of around ¥8 million to ¥10 million is considered a guide (it varies by situation).
Can a bonus (director's bonus) be treated as an expense?
In principle it is not deductible, but it can be made deductible if it meets the requirements for "pre-determined fixed-amount salary," which is notified to the tax office in advance. You must pay it exactly as notified in amount and timing.
Should I take social insurance premiums into account too?
Yes. Director compensation is the basis for calculating social insurance premiums, and because the burden is large when you include the employer's share, it is important to estimate the optimal amount by including not just tax but also social insurance premiums.
Sources and official information
This article is based on the following official information. Rules may be revised. Please check the latest information on each official site.
- National Tax Agency — Tax Answer No.5200 Director salary (in Japanese)
- National Tax Agency — Tax Answer No.5759 Special corporate tax rate for small and mid-sized companies (in Japanese)
- Japan Pension Service — Employees' pension insurance premium table (FY2024) (in Japanese)
- National Tax Agency — Tax Answer No.2260 Income tax rates (in Japanese)
- Ministry of Finance — Overview of corporate tax (in Japanese)
* The content of this article is for informational purposes and is not tax or legal advice. For individual tax judgments, please consult your local tax office or a tax accountant.